Traditional Construction vs. Industrialized Building System (IBS)
The construction sector is one of the largest in the world economy and impacts the world’s GDP. Yet, the global opinions are the constructions are still less digitized. There could be plenty of barriers and limitations. For instance, the high demand, labor costs, technological advancement, and the unforeseeable pandemic. The call for changes have made some players to adopt modern method of construction. One of the primary example is Industrialized Building System (IBS).

Traditional Construction Vs. IBS Construction
1. Speed
2. Cost-Effective
- Material Cost: IBS Construction makes bulk and repeat purchases through standardization. Traditional Construction purchases according to project requirements.
- Labor Cost: IBS Construction can manage the need for a large number of workers. Traditional construction tasks like bricklaying, concrete casting, and manual assembly need more labor.
- Overhead Cost: IBS Construction benefits from quality control and efficient resource usage. Traditional construction may have higher overhead costs. Such as material handling, weather delays, and quality control challenges.
3. Quality
4. Safety
5. Sustainability

The Next Big Thing In Construction
IBS construction revolutionizes construction methods while retaining traditional methods. As it is proven to be able to offer benefits in efficiency, quality, and sustainability. As technology evolves, players in the construction industry are expected to take action. As a best choice, IBS Construction offers efficient building solutions for the future.
One Response
Comments are closed.