Traditional Construction vs. Industrialized Building System (IBS)

The construction sector is one of the largest in the world economy and impacts the world’s GDP. Yet, the global opinions are the constructions are still less digitized. There could be plenty of barriers and limitations. For instance, the high demand, labor costs, technological advancement, and the unforeseeable pandemic. The call for changes have made some players to adopt modern method of construction. One of the primary example is Industrialized Building System (IBS).

Modular construction assembling at Sweden

Traditional Construction Vs. IBS Construction

Traditional construction is a process of building primary structural elements on-site. In contrast, industrialized building systems (IBS) construct prefabricated components in a factory. Later, workers will assemble those prefabrications on-site. While both approaches have their pros and cons, let’s look at how IBS may be a better choice.

1. Speed

IBS construction permits faster completion. The components are prefabricated and ready for assembly according to schedule without interruption. Traditional construction will need to depend on weather conditions. Such a method also faces delays due to its difficulty handling its large components. IBS construction usually uses components that are easier to assemble and erect.

2. Cost-Effective

IBS Construction will save costs, whereas traditional construction requires higher costs as follows:
  • Material Cost: IBS Construction makes bulk and repeat purchases through standardization. Traditional Construction purchases according to project requirements.
  • Labor Cost: IBS Construction can manage the need for a large number of workers. Traditional construction tasks like bricklaying, concrete casting, and manual assembly need more labor.
  • Overhead Cost: IBS Construction benefits from quality control and efficient resource usage. Traditional construction may have higher overhead costs. Such as material handling, weather delays, and quality control challenges.

3. Quality

IBS construction uses standardized processes and prefabrication for consistent, reliable quality. Traditional construction requires addressing on-site complexities, weather dependencies, and skilled labor.

4. Safety

IBS Construction generally offers better and safer advantages. Factory-based IBS production and controlled assembly eliminate on-site risks and safety hazards. Traditional construction demands safety measures to protect workers during large-scale activities.

5. Sustainability

IBS construction offers sustainability benefits compared to traditional construction. Including reduced waste, energy efficiency, resource conservation, and lower carbon emissions.
Construction worker working inside a modular production factory in Penang, Malaysia

The Next Big Thing In Construction

IBS construction revolutionizes construction methods while retaining traditional methods. As it is proven to be able to offer benefits in efficiency, quality, and sustainability. As technology evolves, players in the construction industry are expected to take action. As a best choice, IBS Construction offers efficient building solutions for the future.

One Response

Comments are closed.